Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 142/2022

Case between Chithra Satheesan vs Sudha Manoj Kumar regarding settlement in mediation

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chithra Satheesan filed a suit against Sudha Manoj Kumar. The matter was settled between the parties through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the terms of the mediation agreement lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement reached by the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the terms of the mediation agreement lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement reached by the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the mediation agreement found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chithra Satheesan
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha Manoj Kumar
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kabil Chandran T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Anjali
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun George D
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee in view of the settlement in mediation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee in view of the settlement in mediation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Attachment ordered in IA 2/22 is hereby vacated.
Evidence:
Attachment ordered in IA 2/22 is hereby vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chithra Satheesan vs Sudha Manoj Kumar regarding settlement in mediation
Case Code Year
Case between Chithra Satheesan vs Sudha Manoj Kumar regarding settlement in mediation

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won