Case Summary
Chinnamma Thampi and Eldho Olickal are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Kurian T C and Susan Kurian. The court is considering a petition to accept an additional written statement filed by the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition is allowed on costs of Rs.500/-. Additional written statement filed is accepted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for the acceptance of the additional written statement filed by the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The court found merit in allowing the additional written statement for effective adjudication of the case.
The court found merit in allowing the additional written statement for effective adjudication of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
This court is satisfied that the acceptance of additional written statement is essential for a proper and effective adjudication of the case on merits.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Petition is allowed on costs of Rs.500/-. Additional written statement filed is accepted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chinnamma Thampi
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o late Olickal Thampi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Eldho Olickal
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o late Olickal Thampi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kurian T C
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o Chandy C P
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Susan Kurian
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o Kurian T C
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sibi Karun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P M Joshi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bony Baby
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Siji K Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prasoon K P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Acceptance of the additional written statement filed by the defendants.
Evidence:
Accordingly I find merit in the above petition. But the inconvenience caused to plaintiff shall be adequately compensated.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Written Statement
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This additional written statement was filed to respond to the amended plaint.
Reference:
Document Type:
Exhibit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents were marked as Exhibits during the trial proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Failure to file additional written statement
Case Code
Case between Chinnamma Thampi et al vs Kurian T C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Chinnamma Thampi et al vs Kurian T C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.