Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 163/2024

Case between Chennujan vs Sunitha regarding eviction and rent arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-05-20
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months
Case Closed
Tue, 05/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chennujan, the petitioner and landlord, is seeking eviction of Sunitha, the tenant, for not vacating after lease expiry and failing to pay rent, accumulating significant arrears. The petitioner requires the apartment for her aged parents.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction due to the respondent's failure to vacate and pay rent. The tenant is to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from the order.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for eviction due to the respondent's failure to vacate and pay rent. The tenant is to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's claim was substantiated through unrebutted testimony and evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner's claim was substantiated through unrebutted testimony and evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A4 established her case as pleaded by her. It shows that the rent is in arrears. The bonafide need was also projected by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- 1.The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chennujan
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha
Party Age
50
Relation
C/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original rent agreement dated 01.01.2023, Lawyer’s notice dated 24.09.2024, Original postal receipt dated 24.09.2024, Original cover with lawyer’s notice along with acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu Das
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sruthi Das
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Majesh P.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Maria Neethu T.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anagha A. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Swurav B.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Safna P.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is granted possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent is evicted due to non-payment of rent.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original rent agreement dated 01.01.2023 establishes the terms of the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer’s notice dated 24.09.2024 was issued to the respondent demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal receipt dated 24.09.2024 supports delivery of the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cover with Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original cover with lawyer’s notice and acknowledgment card returned from the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chennujan vs Sunitha regarding eviction and rent arrears
Case Code Year
Case between Chennujan vs Sunitha regarding eviction and rent arrears

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 05/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown