Case Summary
Chekath Pathumma and others are the decree holders, while Muhammedkutty and others are the judgment debtors. This case involves the execution of a decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was processed, and the delivery was effected. The case stands closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Delivery was successfully effected in the execution petition.
Delivery was successfully effected in the execution petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Delivery was successfully effected in the execution petition.
Delivery was successfully effected in the execution petition.
Supporting Evidence
Delivery was successfully effected in the execution petition.
Judgment Evidence:
Decree Holder represented. Delivery effected. EP stands closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chekath Pathumma
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kodassery Aboobaker
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rukiya
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shereefa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammedkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moitheenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moithutty
- Party Age
- 44
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 41
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shereefa
- Party Age
- 39
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016