Original Suit No. 253 OF 2016

Case between Chatheri Mammad vs Moideenkutty et al regarding injunction

Court

IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt.SUSHAMA.P.

Order Date

2019-06-04

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chatheri Mammad filed a suit against Moideenkutty and others for injunction. The court rejected the suit due to balance court fee not being paid and lack of instructions from the plaintiff's counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Suit for injunction

Final Judgment

The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to unpaid court fees and lack of counsel instructions.

Key Reasoning:
Balance court fee not paid and counsel for the plaintiff reported no instructions.

Why Defendant Won:
Balance court fee not paid and counsel for the plaintiff reported no instructions.

Supporting Evidence

Balance court fee not paid and counsel for the plaintiff reported no instructions.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 4th day of June, 2019.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Chatheri Mammad
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Moideenkutty
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: The Executive Engineer

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kunhimoideen
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.M.Vijayakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt. Sanitha.A.K.
Appearance Type: Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Suit for injunction

Evidence:

Plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification