Case between Chartered Air Travels vs Saritha Gopi regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Case Summary

Chartered Air Travels, represented by Mr. K M Salim, filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against Saritha Gopi to prevent her from forcefully entering their office or taking possession of documents. The court found that the petitioner has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favor.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court issued a temporary prohibitory injunction restraining Saritha Gopi from entering the office of Chartered Air Travels or taking possession of their documents until further orders.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Temporary prohibitory injunction

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The court issued a temporary prohibitory injunction restraining Saritha Gopi from entering the office of Chartered Air Travels or taking possession of their documents until further orders.

Why Plaintiff Won:

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

From the records on file, I am satisfied that petitioner has a primafacie case and balance of convenience is in his favour. If the injunction as sought for is refused, it may cause irreparable injury to him.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence respondents and men under him are restrained by an order of temporary injunction restraining the respondent herein from forcefully entering the office of the plaintiff or forcefully taking possession of the documents from the plaintiff until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Chartered Air Travels
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Saritha Gopi
Party Age: 39

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Luke J Chirayil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Temporary prohibitory injunction restraining the respondent from forcefully entering the office of the plaintiff or forcefully taking possession of the documents from the plaintiff until further orders.

Evidence: