Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 382/2024

Case between Chanthukutty @ Radhakrishnan vs Narayanan Nair NV et al regarding cancellation of document and permanent prohibitory Injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-09-25
Duration
approximately-2 years 21 days
Case Closed
Thu, 09/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chanthukutty @ Radhakrishnan filed a suit against Narayanan Nair NV and BP Soumini seeking cancellation of a document and a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims rights over the plaint schedule property, which he asserts was wrongfully mortgaged as security.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, cancelling the disputed document and issuing a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Cancellation of document No. 2025/1999 and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from alienating the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, cancelling the disputed document and issuing a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence showed the plaintiff's entitlement to a decree as prayed for.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence showed the plaintiff's entitlement to a decree as prayed for.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A9 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. That document No. 2025/1999 of Kakkodi SRO is hereby cancelled. 2. The defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from alienating the plaint schedule property and from committing waste therein by virtue of sale deed No. 2025/1999 of Kakkodi SRO. 3. The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chanthukutty @ Radhakrishnan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Narayanan Nair NV
Party Age
84
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
BP Soumini
Party Age
77
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of jenmam assignment deed No.2205/99, Demand notice issued by Special Deputy Thahasildar, Orders in PLP (D)35590/2015 and PLP (D)35595/2015 of District Legal Service Authority, Ownership certificate issued by Kuruvattoor Grama Panchayath, Land Tax receipts, Notice Number 9016/24-25 issued by Deputy Collector.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Unnikrishnan Puthalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K Madhumohanan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Cancellation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Cancellation of document No. 2025/1999.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed as follows: 1That document No. 2025/1999 of Kakkodi SRO is hereby cancelled.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from alienating the property.
Evidence:
The defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from alienating the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to receive costs of the suit from defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Jenmam assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates ownership and right over the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows prior legal actions taken regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Related to settlement of a previous financial complaint.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Related to settlement of another financial complaint.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(a)
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(b)
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(c)
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(d)
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(e)
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(f)
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's continuous ownership and responsibility towards the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(g)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates legal notice given to the defendants regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Associated with the lawyer notice document.
Reference:
Ext.A7(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Associated with the lawyer notice document.
Reference:
Ext.A7(b)
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Relevant to a previous notice issued regarding financial obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the agreement between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant regarding loan security.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chanthukutty @ Radhakrishnan vs Narayanan Nair NV et al regarding cancellation of document and permanent prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Chanthukutty @ Radhakrishnan vs Narayanan Nair NV et al regarding cancellation of document and permanent prohibitory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sat, 08/19/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 09/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won