Case Summary
Chandrabose and others, as decree holders, filed an execution petition against Rajamma and others, the judgment debtors. The decree holders were absent in court, leading to the dismissal of their petition for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holders in court.
Key Reasoning:
Decree holder was absent and no representation was made.
Decree holder was absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Decree holder absent and no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandrabose
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Baby
- Party Age
- 67
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nadarajan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mani
- Party Age
- 54
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasad
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajamma
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Narayanan
- Party Age
- 80
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekala
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayaram
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Udayakumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.Saraswathy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chandrabose et al vs Rajamma et al regarding EP proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between Chandrabose et al vs Rajamma et al regarding EP proceedings