Case Summary
C.D.Somasekharan filed a suit against Mani P.K for the refund of a security deposit of Rs. 3,00,000/- related to a property rental agreement. The defendant failed to refund the amount despite requests.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of ₹3,00,000/- with 6% interest per annum from the date of the suit till the date of the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay back the security deposit with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only), with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.D.Somasekharan
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mani P.K
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original of the Agreement, Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh G Prabhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswathy A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Revathy Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepa N.U
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sudheesh Kurup
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The Plaintiff sought the refund of Rs. 3,00,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹3,00,000/-...
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Original of the Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the agreement between the Plaintiff and Defendant for the lease of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued to demand the refund of the security deposit.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt serves as evidence of the communication between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.D.Somasekharan vs Mani P.K regarding refund of security deposit
Case Code Year
Case between C.D.Somasekharan vs Mani P.K regarding refund of security deposit