Case Summary
The plaintiff, Catapult Creative Services Pvt. Ltd., claims that the defendant, HITECH AYUR MEDICITY, owes a balance of Rs. 69,983 for items purchased on credit. The case went uncontested as the defendant did not appear, leading to a decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant directed to pay Rs. 69,983 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 69,983 along with interest. The plaintiff is also awarded the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was proved based on the uncontested evidence presented by the plaintiff.
The case was proved based on the uncontested evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case was proved based on the uncontested evidence presented by the plaintiff.
The case was proved based on the uncontested evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. Hence, there is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs. 69,983 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Catapult Creative Services Pvt. Ltd.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joison Joseph
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- HITECH AYUR MEDICITY
Plaintiffs Documents
Tax invoices, Lawyer Notice, Computer print of ledger account statement, Copy of form I Certificate of incorporation
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Belsson Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kishore Kumar M.V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court ordered the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.69,983/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.69,983/- from the defendant.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Tax Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents were used to establish the sales transactions and the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 series
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was likely used to notify the defendant regarding outstanding payments.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal Envelope
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was referenced in the context of communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the financial relationship and outstanding balance of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Certificate of Incorporation
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed the legal status of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Catapult Creative Services Pvt. Ltd. vs HITECH AYUR MEDICITY regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Catapult Creative Services Pvt. Ltd. vs HITECH AYUR MEDICITY regarding realisation of money