Case Summary
The case involves Canara Bank as the decree holder and Sharmi Shihab along with Shihabudeen as judgment debtors. The execution petition was filed and dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed for default as the decree holder was absent and no steps were taken.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No step taken. Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Senior Manager Bijimol A.S
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sharmi Shihab
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- D/o Shihabudeen
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shihabudeen
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o Noohukannu.V
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Udayabhanu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Execution petition dismissed for default.
Evidence:
No step taken. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Sharmi Shihab et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Sharmi Shihab et al regarding execution petition