Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
C S.77/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.J.J.Ceramics and Granites et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
II Addl. Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Vandana R
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
approximately-4 years 10 months
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank has filed a suit against M/s.J.J.Ceramics and Granites and its partners for the recovery of a loan amounting to Rs. 14,49,161/- due to defaults in repayments. The defendants were set ex-parte as they did not enter appearance in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to jointly and severally pay the amount due along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay an amount of Rs. 14,49,161/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to jointly and severally pay the amount due along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved their case through the evidence of the bank manager and various documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved their case through the evidence of the bank manager and various documents.
Supporting Evidence
From the evidence of PW1, coupled with documentary evidence, I find that the plaintiff has succeeded in proving their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (1) Defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay an amount of Rs. 14,49,161/- (Rupees Fourteen lakhs forty nine thousand one hundred and sixty one only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.J.J.Ceramics and Granites
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jamsheer T.P
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayisha Noufeera K.C
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Partnership letter, Request for overdraft facilities, Letter of undertaking, Pronote, Guarantee agreement, Sanction memorandum.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.K.Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Asokan Pazhur
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay an amount of Rs. 14,49,161/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (1)Defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay an amount of Rs. 14,49,161/- (Rupees Fourteen lakhs forty nine thousand one hundred and sixty one only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partnership letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Signed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Guarantee covering letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Between defendants and plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Guarantee covering letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Addressed to plaintiff by defendant No.3
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff bank
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Partnership letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Application Form for Loans to Micro Small and Medium Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Letter from the guarantor
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Whenever limits are to be renewed
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff bank
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Application Form for Loans to Micro Small and Medium Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To DPN executed by defendants
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff bank
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Partnership letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendants in favour of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Letter from the guarantor
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Whenever limits are to be renewed
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff bank
Reference:
Ext.A23
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
From 01.01.2020 to 30.06.2024
Reference:
Ext.A24
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
From 29.11.2021 to 29.06.2024
Reference:
Ext.A25
Document Type: True copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Addressed to defendants by plaintiff counsel
Reference:
Ext.A26
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notice
Reference:
Ext.A26(a)
Document Type: Returned Postal Cover with Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notice
Reference:
Ext.A26(b)
Document Type: Returned Postal Cover with Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notice
Reference:
Ext.A26(c)
Document Type: Returned Postal Cover with Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notice
Reference:
Ext.A26(d)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.J.J.Ceramics and Granites et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.J.J.Ceramics and Granites et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 07/07/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sreesha.K et al regarding realisation of money
II Addl. Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The State Bank of India et al vs Haneefa R.K regarding realisation of money
II Additional Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Hamsa.P.T regarding realisation of money
Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge's Court, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Fathima Aslaha E.P. et al regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won