Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.188/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs Angel Bincy.T.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration
approximately-8 years 9 months
Case Closed
Fri, 12/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against Angel Bincy.T.S and her parents for the recovery of an education loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite receiving reminders from the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount with interest. The bank is entitled to recover ₹2,93,145 along with future interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to recover ₹2,93,145 and interest at the rate of 12.65% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount with interest. The bank is entitled to recover ₹2,93,145 along with future interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants failed to repay the loan and were set ex parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendants were set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,93,145/- from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Angel Bincy.T.S
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thulaseedharan. K
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sofiamma. P.R
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.A1 is the loan application submitted by the defendants dated 10/04/2017, Ext.A2 is the general agreement dated 10/04/2017, Ext.A3 is the statement of accounts for the period from 10/04/2017 to 16/01/2025.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,93,145/- from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,93,145/- from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 12.65% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 12.65% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Future Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application submitted by the defendants dated 10/04/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: General Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The general agreement dated 10/04/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement of accounts for the period from 10/04/2017 to 16/01/2025.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Angel Bincy.T.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Angel Bincy.T.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/06/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 12/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won