Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1898/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Abdul Vahab.E et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-12-03
Duration
approximately-9 years 4 months
Case Closed
Wed, 12/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank attempting to recover a loan amount from the defendants, Abdul Vahab.E and Ebrahim.A, who failed to repay the loan taken in 2016. The defendants argued that their business suffered due to the COVID-19 pandemic, causing them to default on the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing Canara Bank to recover the sum of Rs.3,51,614/- from the defendants along with applicable interest. The defendants were held accountable for their failure to repay the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,51,614/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing Canara Bank to recover the sum of Rs.3,51,614/- from the defendants along with applicable interest. The defendants were held accountable for their failure to repay the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendants owed the amount as claimed in the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendants were set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,51,614/- from the defendants and their assets. 2. Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.75% per annum with monthly rests from 01/08/2022 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Vahab.E
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ebrahim.A
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
06/07/2016 Loan application, 22/07/2016 Composite Hypothecation agreement, 25/03/2022 Acknowledgment of debt and security
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,51,614/- from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,51,614/- from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.75% per annum with monthly rests from 01/08/2022 till the date of decree.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.75% per annum with monthly rests from 01/08/2022 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the loan application submitted by the defendants dated 06/07/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the composite hypothecation agreement dated 22/07/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the guarantee agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is an acknowledgment of debt and security dated 25/03/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the statement of accounts.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Abdul Vahab.E et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Abdul Vahab.E et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 07/06/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won