Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 978/2022

Case between Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Kavitha. V regarding suit for the realisation of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-11-22
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is filing a suit against Kavitha. V for the recovery of an amount due on a loan. The defendant failed to repay the loan taken for a working capital facility which was due within a year.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,31,727.75 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation with costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case through evidence and the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
PW1 during cross examination stick on his case. Nothing brought out in favour of defendant in cross examination.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,31,727.75/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation with costs, from the defendant and her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kavitha. V
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorization Letter, Loan Application, Sanction Letter, Letter of undertaking, Request for overdraft facility, Pronote with delivery letter, Agreement cum Deed of Hypothecation, Cash Credit agreement, Office copy of Adv. Notice, Postal receipt, Attested copy of statement of account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith A Khader
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Abdul Shahan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the loan amount along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,31,727.75/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Thirty One Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Seven and Seventy five Paise Only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was produced to establish the authority of the bank representative.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the defendant's application for a working capital loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was provided to demonstrate the bank's sanction of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the defendant's commitment related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Request for overdraft facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented to indicate the loan request by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pronote with Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document signifies the defendant's obligation on the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the hypothecation agreement related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document formalizes the cash credit facility provided by the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Office copy of Advocate notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show that a legal notice was issued for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Attested copy of Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document illustrates the account details related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Kavitha. V regarding suit for the realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Kavitha. V regarding suit for the realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 11/10/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Indian Bank et al vs Anandavally.B., Deepthi regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs M/s.Dhanya Swayam Sahaya Sangam et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Jomi.M.Johnson et al regarding Realisation of Money.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sabarinatha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Abhilash Aravindakshan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won