Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
C.S. 47/2023

Case between Canara Bank, Koothali Branch vs Abdul Nazar.K regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Judge
Sri. Priyanka. S.
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration
approximately-7 years 5 months
Case Code No.
47
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank has filed a suit against Abdul Nazar.K for the recovery of loans amounting to Rs.17,08,021/-. The case involves allegations of default on the repayment of two loans taken by the defendant for business purposes.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the total amount due along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs.17,08,021/- with interest along with costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the total amount due along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff stands unchallenged, and the claim was proven based on the unrebutted testimony and documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff stands unchallenged, and the claim was proven based on the unrebutted testimony and documents.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted testimony of PW1 coupled with Exts. A1 to A8, it is found that the plaint claim stands proved...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.17,08,021/- with interest...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank, Koothali Branch
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Nazar.K
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation dated 09.03.2018, Deed of Hypothecation Re: Machinery dated 09.03.2018, Cash credit agreement dated 09.03.2018, Promissory note dated 09.03.2018, Acknowledgment of debt dated 20.01.2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Anil. G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.P.Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Narayanan. M.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the total sum due along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1)The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.17,08,021/- (Rupees seventeen lakh eight thousand and twenty one only) with interest at the rate of 10.45% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of decree...
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
2)The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation re: machinery
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The deed executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank concerning machinery.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cash credit agreement executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The request for overdraft executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment of debt executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement of account maintained by defendant before plaintiff bank showing outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement of account maintained by defendant before plaintiff bank showing outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
C.S.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Case Filed
Fri, 03/09/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Ismayil.N.P regarding money recovery
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Chengottukavu Branch vs Deepasree et al regarding loan repayment
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shahad et al regarding loan repayment
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Unnikulam Branch vs Sidharath et al regarding loan repayment
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Arikkulam Branch vs Rageesh.T.M et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won