Case Summary
C. R. Raji is the plaintiff who filed this suit against Yasodhamani. V and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to appear.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence suit dismissed for default with costs of D2.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C. R. Raji
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yasodhamani. V
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C. S. Madhusoodanan Nair
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar. K
- Party Age
- 58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B. L. Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P. Babukkuttan Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Paul Antony
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suseela Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence suit dismissed for default with costs of D2.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C. R. Raji vs Yasodhamani. V et al regarding suit filed under Code of Civil Procedure.
Case Code Year
Case between C. R. Raji vs Yasodhamani. V et al regarding suit filed under Code of Civil Procedure.