Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 927/2019

Case between C A John vs C A Joseph @ Pappa et al regarding declaration of easement by prescription and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-11-26
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C A John, the plaintiff, seeks to review an order regarding a declaration of easement by prescription and permanent prohibitory injunction. The defendants include C A Joseph and others who oppose the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to review the prior order is allowed, and the advocate commissioner will inspect the property with the assistance of the Taluk Surveyor.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order dated 10.09.2024 in IA 4/2024 is reviewed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to review the prior order is allowed, and the advocate commissioner will inspect the property with the assistance of the Taluk Surveyor.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds to review the order in the interest of justice for effective adjudication of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that there is sufficient ground to review order dated 10.09.2024 in the interest of justice for effective adjudication of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) Petition is allowed. Order dated 10.09.2024 in IA 4/2024 is reviewed. Advocate commissioner shall inspect the property with the assistance of Taluk Surveyor.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C A John
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o late Avirah C V
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C A Joseph @ Pappa
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o late C V Antony
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C V Varghese @ Vakkachan
Party Age
69
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C V Martin @ Benny
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lekha P
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o Madhuraj Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A T Anil Kumar (Anil Mamala)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishob K Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Balram S A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anupama R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shibu Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajith Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anoopa M J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V C Xavier
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sruthy R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanu S Malakeel
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Princy Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rohan Babu Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Litty P Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S Renjith
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P K Sreevalsakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K R Prathish
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Review of order dated 10.09.2024 in IA 4/2024 allowing advocate commissioner to inspect the property with assistance of a Taluk Surveyor.
Evidence:
Accordingly, this court is satisfied that there is sufficient ground to review order dated 10.09.2024 in the interest of justice for effective adjudication of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court reviewed and modified its earlier order in this petition.
Reference:
IA 4/2024
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referenced this order to highlight the oversight regarding the appointment of the Taluk Surveyor.
Reference:
OP(C) 1692/2023

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C A John vs C A Joseph @ Pappa et al regarding declaration of easement by prescription and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between C A John vs C A Joseph @ Pappa et al regarding declaration of easement by prescription and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 12/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won