Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1226/2024

Case between C G Ganesan vs Shine Gireeshan et al regarding temporary injunction and eviction dispute

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-25
Duration
approximately-1 year 21 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C G Ganesan filed a petition against Shine Gireeshan and Shajil Prabha for a temporary injunction to prevent them from evicting him from his jewelry shop. The petitioner claims he has a valid rental agreement and is being threatened with forced eviction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for temporary injunction preventing the defendants from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from his shop, maintaining that he has a valid tenancy agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining defendants from trespassing into the shop room and forcibly evicting the petitioner.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for temporary injunction preventing the defendants from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from his shop, maintaining that he has a valid tenancy agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner established a prima facie case and that he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case, Ext.A1 agreement was for a period of 11 months from 06.04.2024 and the petitioner is regular in payment of rent as evident from the passbook produced.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) Petition is allowed. Respondent is restrained by temporary injunction from trespassing into plaint schedule shop room and also forcefully dispossessing the petitioner from the plaint schedule shop room against the terms and conditions in rent deed dated 06.03.2024 without due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C G Ganesan
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shine Gireeshan
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shajil Prabha
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Rent Deed executed between the plaintiff and defendant, Copy of Account Statement pertaining to the plaintiff account with Peoples Urban Co-Operative Bank, Tripunithura, Photograph, Copy of Cheque no: 706322 in Peoples Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Copy of Bank pass book of account no: 124517
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M S Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aaditya Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ardra Krishnan M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Diya Merin Biju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anusree B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Binny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restriction of respondents from trespassing into the shop room and forcefully evicting the petitioner.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and injury if an order of injunction is not passed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the rental agreement between the petitioner and respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the financial transactions related to the payment of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as evidence but its specific relevance is not detailed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the payment of rent by cheque, which was not accepted by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Bank Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides proof of the payment history relevant to the rental agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report was used to determine facts related to the eviction and the state of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C G Ganesan vs Shine Gireeshan et al regarding temporary injunction and eviction dispute
Case Code Year
Case between C G Ganesan vs Shine Gireeshan et al regarding temporary injunction and eviction dispute

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 03/06/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won