Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1185/2022

Case between Bobby Mathew et al vs Jaya K M et al regarding Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-12-12
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Bobby Mathew and Alpha George, are husband and wife who filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jaya K M and Shihab A A. The plaintiffs claimed that they were tenants in possession of the property and sought protection from eviction attempts by the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, restraining them from forcibly evicting the plaintiffs from the property. The court also directed the defendants to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiffs and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, restraining them from forcibly evicting the plaintiffs from the property. The court also directed the defendants to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that plaintiffs have established their case. The unchallenged oral and documentary evidence is sufficient to grant a decree in favour of plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiffs from plaint schedule property. 2) Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiffs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bobby Mathew
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alpha George
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaya K M
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihab A A
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of mortgage deed dated 11.02.2020, Copy of complaint dated 21.11.2022, Copy of Bank statement of SBI from 01.01.2020 to 27.12.2020, Acknowledgment receipt dated 21.11.2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gikku Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M V Rathish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiffs from plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiffs from plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiffs.
Evidence:
2) Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mortgage Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the plaint schedule property is mortgaged to the plaintiffs for 11 months and that the 1st plaintiff paid Rs.6,00,000/- to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the complaint filed before the Commissioner of Police, Ernakulam by the 2nd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the statement of account issued from SBI.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is an acknowledgment receipt related to the plaintiffs' dealings.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document shows the lie and nature of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document is a rough sketch related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bobby Mathew et al vs Jaya K M et al regarding Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Bobby Mathew et al vs Jaya K M et al regarding Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 12/02/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won