Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 232/2024

Case between Bindu.V et al vs Sulekha Beevi regarding property inheritance

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
approximately-4 years 5 months
Case Code No.
232
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Bindu and Minimol, are the sisters and legal heirs of their deceased brother Jayakumar, who died intestate. They are seeking to gain control over his estate from the defendant, Sulekha Beevi, who claims to be the legal heir and widow of Jayakumar.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the petition, restraining the defendant from alienating or encumbering the property claimed by the plaintiffs until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restraint order on the defendant from alienating or encumbering the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the petition, restraining the defendant from alienating or encumbering the property claimed by the plaintiffs until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case regarding their entitlement to the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case regarding their entitlement to the property.
Supporting Evidence
The contention of the petitioners is that they are the legal heirs of the Late Jayakumar and the defendant is not the legal heir and is not the legally wedded wife.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: The defendant is restrained from alienating, encumbering, creating third party interest in the petition schedule property and building until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu.V
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Minimol
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulekha Beevi
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Sale Deed No.2510/2020, Death Certificate, Relationship Certificate, Copy of notice, Reply Notice
Defendants Documents
Marriage Deed, Legal Heirship Certificate

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S.Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.Nazeer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is restrained from alienating, encumbering, creating third party interest in the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
The petition is liable to be allowed. The defendant is restrained from alienating, encumbering, creating third party interest in the petition schedule property and building until further orders.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The present injunction application is filed seeking interim injunction restraining the defendant from alienating encumbering, creating 3rd party interest in the aforesaid land and building.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the sale deed related to the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate proving the death of Jayakumar.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Relationship Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document asserting the relationship between the plaintiffs and Jayakumar.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the notice issued to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant's reply to the notice issued by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Marriage Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document proving the marriage between the defendant and Jayakumar.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Application related to the marriage registered in a mosque.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Legal heirship certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate establishing the defendant as the legal heir.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Copy of Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Order related to a previous interim application.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Treasury Pass book
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document related to financial transactions of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 07/13/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won