Case Summary
Bindu, the decree holder, sought property delivery from judgment debtors Kuttan and Lahta.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Property has been delivered, and the Execution Petition is closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bindu
- Party Age
- 39
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kuttan
- Party Age
- 50
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lahta
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- GOPIKADAVATH
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Kuttan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for 2
- Appearance Type
- Case between Bindu vs Kuttan and Lahta regarding property delivery > Case advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Description:
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected. EP closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017