ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 221 OF 2016

Case between Bindu et al vs Kuttan et al regarding partition.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-02-13

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit for partition filed by Bindu and her son Vysakh Mohan against Kuttan and Latha. A compromise petition was filed and the court approved a preliminary decree based on the terms of the compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

A preliminary decree for partition was passed based on the terms of the lawful compromise petition filed by the parties involved.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

A preliminary decree for partition was passed based on the terms of the lawful compromise petition filed by the parties involved.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The terms of compromise were found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful a preliminary decree is hereby passed as per the terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Bindu
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vysakh Mohan. T.
Party Age: 11
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kuttan
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Latha
Party Age: 53
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Compromise petition filed as I.A.336/2017.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Munawar Fyrooz.K.P.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Preliminary decree passed as per the terms of compromise.

Evidence: