Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 56/2019

Case between Bindu Antony vs Annamma P.V. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bindu Antony, did not appear in court to provide evidence. As a result, the court dismissed the suit for default when the case was called for trial.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not turn up to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu Antony
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annamma P.V.
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew M.J.
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajayan
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jolly
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V. Shiji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.T. Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present. Called absent. Today listed for trial. Plaintiff did not turn up to adduce evidence. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bindu Antony vs Annamma P.V. et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Bindu Antony vs Annamma P.V. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won