Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 54/2020

Case between Biju.S.Nair vs Sasi Kumar regarding status quo maintenance.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-IV (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
Case Code No.
54
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Biju S. Nair as the original plaintiff and Sasi Kumar as the original defendant. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding a specific pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court ordered both parties to maintain the status quo as it was during the visit of the commissioner. They are prohibited from making alterations to a specified pathway.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered both parties to maintain the status quo as it was during the visit of the commissioner. They are prohibited from making alterations to a specified pathway.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Both parties are directed to maintain status quo as on visit of commissioner in IA.15/25 dated 19/11/2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Biju.S.Nair
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasi Kumar
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Rahul.K.Narayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Dinesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Gautham.S.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Judy Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Amlasree Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Both parties are directed to maintain status quo as on visit of commissioner.
Evidence:
Both parties are directed to maintain status quo as on visit of commissioner in IA.15/25 dated 19/11/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court ordered both parties to maintain status quo as on the visit of the commissioner.
Reference:
IA.15/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won