Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 338/2022

Case between Bhasakaran et al vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding settlement of disputes

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
approximately-3 years 21 days
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Bhasakaran and Sreelatha Pillai settled their disputes with the defendant Radhakrishna Pillai through a joint compromise. The court accepted the terms of this compromise and issued a decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit based on a joint compromise between the parties. The defendant is prevented from entering the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant handed over keys and all registered deeds to the plaintiffs and is prevented from entering the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit based on a joint compromise between the parties. The defendant is prevented from entering the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The joint compromise was accepted since the terms were lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The joint compromise is accepted since the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

The joint compromise is accepted since the terms are lawful. So the suit is decreed as follows.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bhasakaran
Party Age
93
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreelatha Pillai
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishna Pillai
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Joint compromise, Various rent deeds.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Ramesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Jayakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed as the terms of the joint compromise are lawful.
Evidence:
The joint compromise is accepted since the terms are lawful.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is prevented from entering into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant or anybody under him are prevented from entering into plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant has no right, title, interest in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant will have no right, title, interest in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall not use licenses or authorities obtained on the basis of the above rent deeds.
Evidence:
The defendant shall not use Licenses, or Authorities obtain on the basis of the above mentioned rent deeds.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint Compromise
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Accepted since the terms are lawful and formed part of the decree.
Reference:
Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Set aside by the court.
Reference:
Rent deed Nos. 2367/2017, 2208/18, 2836/2019

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bhasakaran et al vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding settlement of disputes
Case Code Year
Case between Bhasakaran et al vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding settlement of disputes

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Thu, 06/02/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won