Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1031/2018

Case between Bencily Joseph et al vs Pavinose @ Raju regarding injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Bencily Joseph and others, filed a suit for injunction against the defendant, Pavinose @ Raju. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff remained absent and did not provide any representation.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bencily Joseph
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Marikutty
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vimala
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George Kutty
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pavinose @ Raju
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
I. Stevenson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. Moti
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Sheejakumari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
J.R. Jamini
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready for adduce any evidence . Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bencily Joseph et al vs Pavinose @ Raju regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Bencily Joseph et al vs Pavinose @ Raju regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam Taluk
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won