Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 83/2023

Case between Basheer T.A. vs Abdul Salam M.C regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-04-08
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Basheer T.A., seeks eviction of the respondent, Abdul Salam M.C., for default in rent payment and unlawful subletting of the property. The case involves allegations of breach of the rent agreement and a claim for possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the respondent must give possession of the property to the petitioner within 30 days. Additionally, costs of the petition are to be borne by the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order for possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the respondent must give possession of the property to the petitioner within 30 days. Additionally, costs of the petition are to be borne by the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved his case by showing that the respondent defaulted in payment and sublet the property in violation of the terms of the rent agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved his case by showing that the respondent defaulted in payment and sublet the property in violation of the terms of the rent agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has proved his case that the respondent after taking the petition schedule building on rent sublet the petition schedule building in violation to the terms of the rent agreement. The petitioner has also proved his bonafide need of starting his business in the petition schedule building.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed. 1. The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Basheer T.A.
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Salam M.C
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Certified copy of the Sale deed No. 607/1/2021, Property Tax receipt, Land Tax receipt, Rent Agreement, FIR copies.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.N. Mohammed Thanveer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rameez Noor
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abilash Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joy C. Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eldhose Joy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reejo Johnson
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Noble George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the 1st respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the 1st respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The power of attorney holder represented the petitioner in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of the Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of the petitioner's title to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the petitioner's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supported the ownership claims of the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Essential for establishing the terms under which the property was rented.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of the Private Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to establish the background of the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of the FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence regarding the legal issues surrounding the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of the Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to show ongoing legal actions involving the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified copy of the FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided additional evidence regarding the legal issues with the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated the petitioner's formal demand for possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of service for the lawyer notice sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Unclaimed postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated that the respondent did not receive the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided evidence of the condition and status of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting the commissioner report regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Basheer T.A. vs Abdul Salam M.C regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Basheer T.A. vs Abdul Salam M.C regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 05/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won