Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.216/2023

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sisupalan A.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-12
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months 9 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the Bank of Baroda suing Sisupalan A.K. and Shyla C.K. for the realization of a personal loan that has not been repaid. The defendants defaulted on their loan payments despite acknowledging their liability.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount due from the defendants. The defendants were liable for their default on the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,33,989.58 from the defendants and from their assets with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount due from the defendants. The defendants were liable for their default on the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff and the documents submitted established the plaintiff's case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff and the documents submitted established the plaintiff's case.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Ext. A1 to A9 established his case as pleaded by him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,33,989.58 from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
represented by its Senior Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sisupalan A.K.
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyla C.K.
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction letter dated 03.01.2020, Declaration cum undertaking Cum Authority dated 03.01.2020, Demand promissory note dated 03.01.2020, Letter of installment with acceleration clause dated 03.01.2020, General form of Guarantee dated 03.01.2020, Letter of acknowledgment of debt dated 19.08.2022, Office copy of lawyer notice dated 01.12.2022, Statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh G. Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa N.U.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,33,989.58 from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,33,989.58 from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
2.The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.2,33,989.58 from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 6% per annum from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
3. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.2,33,989.58 from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
4. The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original sanction letter issued by the plaintiff to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Declaration Cum Undertaking Cum Authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original declaration cum undertaking executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original promissory note executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of installment with acceleration clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original letter of installment executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: General form of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original general form of guarantee executed by the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer's notice issued by the plaintiff to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original acknowledgment card related to the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of accounts for the period from 03.01.2020 to 24.01.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sisupalan A.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sisupalan A.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/03/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won