Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 940/2020

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Ranju V.M. regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-15
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/15/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Ranju V.M. for recovery of a loan amount due. The defendant had taken a loan from the bank and defaulted on repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Realization of Rs. 76,541.80 from the defendant with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the loan agreement and default of payment by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the loan agreement and default of payment by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
Upon considering the unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 and Ext. A1 to A7, the plaintiff has proved his case before the court and is therefore, entitled to get a decree as he prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows. The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 76,541.80 from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ranju V.M.
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
A1­ 20.10.2015­ Loan application, A2­ 21.10.2015­Sanction letter, A3­ 21.10.2015­Loan agreement cum hypothecation deed, A4­ 24.09.2018­letter of acknowledgment of debt, A5­ 19.08.2020­ Office copy of lawyer notice, A6­ 22.08.2020­ Postal receipts, A7­ Statement of accounts pertaining to Account No.204706331000024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh G. Prahu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepu N.U.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 76,541.80 from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows. The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 76,541.80 from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the defendant's request for a loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document shows that the loan was sanctioned in favour of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan agreement cum Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the execution of the loan agreement by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document shows that the defendant acknowledged the debt in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the notice sent to the defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document shows the receipts of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document demonstrates the outstanding amount payable by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Ranju V.M. regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Ranju V.M. regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 10/20/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/15/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won