Case Summary
Bank of Baroda is the plaintiff and M/s Mothers Oven is the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case.
Plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case.
Plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. No steps seen taken.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Mothers Oven
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Princy T.A
- Party Age
- 42
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saira Phiroz
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Davis Pius
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akshara Shivan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent continuously and no representation also. No steps also taken against the defendant even after multiple opportunities.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s Mothers Oven regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s Mothers Oven regarding dismissal for default