Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 858/2024

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s The Fresh Spot et al regarding a commercial dispute

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Baroda as the plaintiff and M/s The Fresh Spot along with Ventilla Noronha as defendants. The suit was filed under the Code of Civil Procedure and was concerning the terms of a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of a compromise agreement that was found lawful and not opposed to public policy. The mediation report was incorporated as part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of a compromise agreement that was found lawful and not opposed to public policy. The mediation report was incorporated as part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Terms found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is decreed in terms of the Compromise agreement forming part of the Mediation Report. Mediation Report shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s The Fresh Spot
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ventilla Noronha
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saira Phiros
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Davis Pius
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akshaya Sivan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Roopkumar G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashwin Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreekumar K.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the Compromise agreement forming part of the Mediation Report
Evidence:
Terms found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s The Fresh Spot et al regarding a commercial dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s The Fresh Spot et al regarding a commercial dispute

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won