OS. No. 669/2019

Case between Bani Balakrishnan et al vs Anil Kumar regarding Injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-07-04

Duration

Case Closed

Fri, 07/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Bani Balakrishnan, S.Arun Kumar, and Nayaswarup.A. are involved in a suit against the defendant, Anil Kumar, for an injunction. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to provide evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default because the plaintiff was absent and did not provide any evidence.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to appear and provide evidence.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs failed to appear and provide evidence.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff’s counsel submitted no instruction from the party. Plaintiff called absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Bani Balakrishnan
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o Late Balakrishnan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: S.Arun Kumar
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o P.Sivadasan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Nayaswarup.A.
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o Ashokan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anil Kumar
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o Somasenan

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: D.Baijukumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Anand Brahmanand
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce any evidence.

Evidence: