Case Summary
Balu B Pillai filed a suit against Vimal Kumar for the realization of money under the civil code. Both parties were absent during the hearing, and the court rejected the plaintiff's claim.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's claim due to both parties being absent and not remitting the BCF.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 16th day of August, 2025 Both side absent represented. BCF not remitted. Sought time for BCF. Sufficient opportunities given. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Balu B Pillai
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vimal Kumar
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akhil. S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Pramod Chakravarthy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreelashmi K.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff filed for realisation of money.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Balu B Pillai vs Vimal Kumar regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Balu B Pillai vs Vimal Kumar regarding realisation of money