Case Summary
The plaintiff, Balan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Santhosh and Vijayan. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff remained absent and did not adduce any evidence.
The plaintiff remained absent and did not adduce any evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Since plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default for evidence in counter claim.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Balan
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhosh
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N. Haridas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Panambil S. Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed for default for evidence in counter claim.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence. Suit dismissed for default for evidence in counter claim.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Balan vs Santhosh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Balan vs Santhosh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction