Case Summary
Balakrishnan, aged 58, filed a suit against Sarada, aged 83, seeking injunction. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Notice returned as not in amsom. Plaintiff called absent. Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Balakrishnan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Pottammal Raman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarada
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- D/o Kodiyath Velu Ezhuthachan
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. K.Beena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Not Decided
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Notice returned as not in amsom. Plaintiff called absent. Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Balakrishnan vs Sarada regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Balakrishnan vs Sarada regarding injunction