Case Summary
The plaintiff, Bakers, represented by its proprietor Kunjachan, was absent during the proceedings. The defendant, J. B Basmathi, represented by its proprietor Jithu George, was present and the court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant was present and the plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The defendant was present and the plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant was present and the plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The defendant was present and the plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bakers
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- J. B Basmathi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bose K. Thachil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Parthasarathy K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bakers vs J. B Basmathi regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Bakers vs J. B Basmathi regarding dismissal of suit