Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Bahuleyan and Kanchana, along with an additional plaintiff Aromal, filed a suit for injunction against the defendant Vijayan. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the final hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and did not present any evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Plaintiff was absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence, Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bahuleyan
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kanchana
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aromal
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 67
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Panambil S. Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B. Sivaprasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence, Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bahuleyan et al vs Vijayan regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Bahuleyan et al vs Vijayan regarding injunction.