Case Summary
The case involves Baby and Jancy as plaintiffs against defendants Shaji and T.K Salim. The court has decided to appoint an Advocate commissioner to assist in noting particulars necessary for the fair adjudication of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the appointment of an Advocate commissioner and a surveyor to assist with the details necessary for the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an Advocate commissioner with the assistance of surveyor is to be appointed to note the particulars required to be ascertained.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Baby
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jancy
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaji
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.K Salim
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.P Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.V. Babu
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.T Geevargheese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anupama M.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
An Advocate commissioner is appointed to note the particulars required for the fair adjudication of the suit.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Baby vs Shaji regarding Advocate commissioner appointment
Case Code Year
Case between Baby vs Shaji regarding Advocate commissioner appointment