Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1607/2019

Case between Baby Francis vs A.K. Devasya et al regarding non prosecution of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-12-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Baby Francis as the plaintiff and A.K. Devasya along with other defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case further.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's and defendants' lack of representation and absence from court. No further action was taken as the plaintiff showed no interest in continuing the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's and defendants' lack of representation and absence from court. No further action was taken as the plaintiff showed no interest in continuing the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present to prosecute the case, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not present to prosecute the case, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff remained absent, though listed for evidence of plaintiff. Hence this court is of opinion that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further.

Judgment Evidence:

Thus, suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby Francis
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.K. Devasya
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph Devasya
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sibi Devasya
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Xavy Joseph
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kurian Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rayjith Mark
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Stejo K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Evidence:
Thus, suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Vacated
Description:
Interim order in IA No. 9105/2019 stands vacated.
Evidence:
Interim order in IA No. 9105/2019 stands vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Baby Francis vs A.K. Devasya et al regarding non prosecution of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Baby Francis vs A.K. Devasya et al regarding non prosecution of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won