Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 18/2025

Case between B. Sukumaran vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding rent arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

B. Sukumaran, the petitioner, seeks to recover rent arrears from RAHA Ayurveda Hospital and its representatives. The case revolves around the non-payment of rent for an apartment leased for 11 months, which has resulted in significant arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court determined that the respondents owed significant rent arrears and directed them to pay the total amount due. The order was partly in favor of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to pay monthly rent arrears of Rs. 1,54,000 within 30 days.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court determined that the respondents owed significant rent arrears and directed them to pay the total amount due. The order was partly in favor of the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found merit in the petitioner's contention regarding non-payment of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found merit in the petitioner's contention regarding non-payment of rent.
Supporting Evidence
It is trite law that proceedings under Section 12 can be invoked against the tenant only when arrears of rent are admitted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed in part and a direction is passed under Section 12 (1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act against the respondent as follows; The respondent is hereby directed to pay monthly rent arrears of Rs. 1,54,000 (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Four Thousand only) which is due as on 31.10.2025, within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B. Sukumaran
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.L. Rajeevan Nair
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
RAHA Ayurveda Hospital
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.M. Aslam
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. A.M. Anwar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
rent agreement dated 06.11.2021, lawyers' notices addressed to the respondents dated 22.02.2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.S. Manu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dilu Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.A. Anupaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.B. Sivaprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Neethu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vijay
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju E.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anandhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Line Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dainy Davis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rilna Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajeeb K. Yusuf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to pay the arrears of rent due.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to pay monthly rent arrears of Rs. 1,54,000 (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Four Thousand only) which is due as on 31.10.2025, within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to continue paying the monthly rent.
Evidence:
The respondent shall continue to remit the rent at the rate of Rs.14,000/- (Rupees Fourteen Thousand Only) per month each for the petition schedule apartment No.107, which may be subsequently fall due, within 15 days from the date of due till the culmination of rent control proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To support the petitioner's claim regarding the landlord-tenant relationship and the agreed monthly rent.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the petitioner's attempts to notify the respondents about the arrears.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Oral evidence
Relevance:
Testimonies presented regarding the payment of rent and the conditions of the lease.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between B. Sukumaran vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding rent arrears
Case Code Year
Case between B. Sukumaran vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding rent arrears

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Philomina Varghese et al vs K R Elizebeth regarding injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Aneesh Kumar C.S vs HDFC Bank regarding injunction and consequential reliefs.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Madan Mohan vs Tina Stephan Menacherry et al regarding tenancy dispute
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding appointments of Chancellor & Finance Officer
The Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won