Case Summary
Petition filed by multiple petitioners seeking eviction of respondent from rented property due to rental arrears and bonafide need to start a business.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiffs
Relief Granted
Directed respondent to provide vacant possession of shop rooms to petitioners within three months
Case Type
Eviction Case
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the petition seeking vacant possession of shop rooms from the respondent due to rental arrears and bonafide need for petitioners to start a business.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the shop rooms for starting a business and the respondent failed to dispute the evidence provided.
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the shop rooms for starting a business and the respondent failed to dispute the evidence provided.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the shop rooms for starting a business and the respondent failed to dispute the evidence provided.
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the shop rooms for starting a business and the respondent failed to dispute the evidence provided.
Supporting Evidence
Since the respondents opted to remain exparte, the evidence adduced by the petitioners remained unchallenged. Therefore I find no reason to disbelieve the bonofide needs put forward by the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
The evidence provided by the petitioners remained unchallenged as the respondent remained exparte.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ayisha Beevi
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o Ozhur Parambil Ummer Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Hameed
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- Child of Ozhur Parambil Ummer Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ibnu Massood
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Child of Ozhur Parambil Ummer Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Saleem
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- Child of Ozhur Parambil Ummer Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shemeer
- Party Age
- 30
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Maimoona
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o Kadengal Ali Akbar
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nadeera
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o Thottiyil Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramanalukkal Yahu
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.C1 - 29-2-2016 - Commission report, Ext.C2 - 29-2-2016 - Commission plan
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directed respondent to provide vacant possession of shop rooms to petitioners within three months
Evidence:
Since the respondents opted to remain exparte, the evidence adduced by the petitioners remained unchallenged.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence
Reference:
Ext.C1 - 29-2-2016
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence
Reference:
Ext.C2 - 29-2-2016
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction Case
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayisha Beevi et al vs Ramanalukkal Yahu regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Ayisha Beevi et al vs Ramanalukkal Yahu regarding eviction