Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 46 OF 20 16

Case between Asya et al vs Nafeesumma et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-02-17
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Fri, 02/17/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Two plaintiffs filed a suit for partition against three defendants. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and had no representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition was dismissed with costs as the plaintiffs were absent.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed with costs as the plaintiffs were absent.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for partition. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Defendant is present. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asya
Party Age
62
Relation
Daughter of Palakkal Unneenkutty
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sainaba
Party Age
54
Relation
Daughter of Palakkal Unneenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nafeesumma
Party Age
65
Relation
Wife of Palakkal Unneenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sainudheen
Party Age
48
Relation
Son of Adhikarath Valappil Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ibrahim kutty
Party Age
46
Relation
Son of Adhikarath Valappil Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheed
Party Age
44
Relation
Son of Adhikarath Valappil Kunhimuhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.P.Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Suit for partition
Evidence:
The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Defendant is present. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Asya et al vs Nafeesumma et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Asya et al vs Nafeesumma et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 02/17/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/17/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 02/28/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Thottupurath Kormman's Son Chatha et al vs Koran et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won