Case Summary
The suit was filed by the plaintiffs for a permanent prohibitory injunction. However, the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ashraf
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sasidharan Pillai
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shihabudeen
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karthikeyan
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chirakkarathazham S. Suresh Kumar Lekshmi S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Shefeek
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopakumar G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Geethu R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction claimed by the plaintiff
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ashraf et al vs Karthikeyan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ashraf et al vs Karthikeyan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction