Case Summary
The plaintiff, Asha, filed this suit for partition and injunction. The defendants include Mangalangi and others.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide any representation. The suit was dismissed for default due to the lack of any application from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asha
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mangalangi
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bindu
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambili
- Party Age
- 42
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jyothi Sagar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bobin V.L.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Panambil S. Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought an injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought partition.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Asha vs Mangalangi et al regarding partition and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Asha vs Mangalangi et al regarding partition and injunction.