Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 72/2023

Case between Asha Sony @ Asha Antony vs T.J Antony @ Sony et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-06-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asha Sony @ Asha Antony filed a suit against T.J Antony @ Sony and others. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence despite a specific order to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence despite a specific order to appear.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asha Sony @ Asha Antony
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.J Antony @ Sony
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
John T.A @ George
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rani @ Thressia
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roja R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.T Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jose Paul Thottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aiswarya Sajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fathima Razak
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benraj K.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence despite a specific direction to appear.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No appearance despite specific direction to appear. No representation. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Asha Sony @ Asha Antony vs T.J Antony @ Sony et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Asha Sony @ Asha Antony vs T.J Antony @ Sony et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won