Case Summary
The plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The judgment was delivered as the plaintiff was absent and the defendants were also not present.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and none of the defendants were present to represent their case.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent.
Plaintiff was absent.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent.
Plaintiff was absent.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. Counter claim plaintiff ready to proceed with evidence.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arun.S
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazar.S
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rejila Beevi
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o Nazar.S
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.S. Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sima.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kannanalloor S.Abdul Karim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The plaintiffs filed for a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arun.S vs Nazar.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Arun.S vs Nazar.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction