Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1096/2024

Case between A.R.Metals et al vs Shanmadharan regarding dismissal of suit

Court
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-11-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, A.R.Metals represented by its partner Rebseena, filed a suit against the defendant Shanmadharan. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the memo and thus the case was dismissed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the memo and thus the case was dismissed.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not press the memo and thus the case was dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.R.Metals
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rebseena
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o Afsal
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shanmadharan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o Narayannan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.S.Mohammed Usman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Priyadevi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arshad Ameen
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.P.Peethambaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Karthika Peethambaran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neeraja Venugopal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arjun J Das
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A.R.Metals et al vs Shanmadharan regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between A.R.Metals et al vs Shanmadharan regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won