Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Arimpoor Francis Jose and others, filed a suit against Rone Infotrade Private Limited and its directors. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiffs not presenting ex-parte evidence despite multiple chances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence. The court did not grant any further time for representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs did not adduce ex-parte evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Plaintiffs did not adduce ex-parte evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs did not adduce ex-parte evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Plaintiffs did not adduce ex-parte evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
No exparte evidence adduced despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arimpoor Francis Jose
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinod T.M
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nelson George
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manikantan N.
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shibu P. D.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rone Infotrade Private Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. C Ratheesh alias Ratheesh Chandraa
- Relation
- Chairman and Managing Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- O. S. Babu alias Harish Babu
- Relation
- Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Preetha Saju
- Relation
- Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sai Harish
- Relation
- Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.S Manu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dilu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.A Anupaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.B Sivaprasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Y Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manju E.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anandhu Satheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alint Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anoop Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswani Thuvakkadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arimpoor Francis Jose et al vs Rone Infotrade Private Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Arimpoor Francis Jose et al vs Rone Infotrade Private Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.