Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition 1799/2016

Case between Areekunnu Sreenivasan vs Dr.K.Abdul Nazer et al regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2017-05-30
Duration
0 years, 9 months, 0 days
Case Closed
Tue, 05/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Areekunnu Sreenivasan filed a restoration petition against Dr.K.Abdul Nazer and 5 others. Petition was allowed on medical grounds with a condition to pay costs to all respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed on medical grounds with a condition to pay costs to each respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed with costs to respondents
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed on medical grounds with a condition to pay costs to each respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner submitted medical ground for his non appearance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner submitted medical ground for his non appearance.
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

The petitioner submitted medical ground for his non appearance. There are 6 respondents. 3 Advocates are appearing in this matter. Hence petition is allowed on condition to pay cost to each respondents @ 500/-. For payment of cost 30-05-2017. On 30-05-2017 Cost paid Petition stands allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Areekunnu Sreenivasan
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. K.Abdul Nazer
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunnath Abdul Shareef
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Poozhithodiyil Abdul Rahman
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunnath Muhammed Shafi
Party Age
32
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ullattil Basila
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tharammal Fabina
Party Age
26
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of petition
Outcome: Allowed with costs to respondents
Description:
Restoration petition allowed with condition to pay costs to respondents.
Evidence:
The petitioner submitted medical ground for his non appearance. There are 6 respondents. 3 Advocates are appearing in this matter. Hence petition is allowed on condition to pay cost to each respondents @ 500/-. For payment of cost 30-05-2017. On 30-05-2017 Cost paid Petition stands allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Areekunnu Sreenivasan vs Dr.K.Abdul Nazer et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Areekunnu Sreenivasan vs Dr.K.Abdul Nazer et al regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 09/09/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 05/30/2017 - 12:00
From
Mon, 05/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Wed, 05/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won